Hello Willy. On 22 September 2011 22:08, Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu> wrote: > Wow, you've hit an amazing bug. I seem to remember we touched that > area reacently when a server port was ignored. I'll have a look at > this, because it's very likely that we fixed it wrong.
Thanks. I had another look at it today, but didn't make much progress. Attempting to work around the problem, I experimented with not setting the SRV_MAPPORTS flag when there is no port specified in the server directive - simply commenting-out the else clause on lines 3933-3934 of cfgparse.c. I then added a test for ((struct sockaddr_in *)&s->req->cons->addr.s.to)->sin_port == 0 in assign_server_address(), and copying the port from s->req->prod->addr.c.to to s->req->cons->addr.s.to Interestingly, this works when HAProxy is run in debug mode, but not as a daemon. In the latter case, it seems that some of the structure elements are not set - in particular s->req->prod->addr.c.to.ss_family and &s->req->prod->addr.c.to->sin_port. I'm not sure if that's expected behaviour when the session structure doesn't have SRV_MAPPORTS set, but it was certainly confusing! Thanks for your help. Nick. -- Nick Chalk. Loadbalancer.org Ltd. Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779 http://www.loadbalancer.org/
