Thanks!

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:54:58AM -0500, Andrew Hayworth wrote:
> (...)
>> I changed %HR -> %HU, and mentioned '(path)' in the docs.
>
> I found it was not changed in the parser nor the doc but I fixed it, don't
> worry.
>
>> > Now concerning the bug, it's not very important but it does exist :
>>
>> Good catch - Suffice it to say I've tested this patch a bit more thoroughly. 
>> :-)
>>
>> After a little reflection and during testing, I also found it
>> confusing that the new
>> directives sometimes logged "<BADREQ>" and sometimes parsed as much as
>> they could out of the request line before giving up. This latest patch
>> more consistently
>> logs "<BADREQ>" if the line is bad. I ended up counting spaces, based on the
>> premise that any valid request in any version of the protocol must
>> contain at least
>> one whitespace character.
>
> That's a good idea indeed.
>
> Thanks for your patience, I've now merged your work. That will definitely
> be useful in a number of circumstances.
>
> Cheers,
> Willy
>



-- 
- Andrew Hayworth

Reply via email to