On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 01:37:59PM +0200, Pavlos Parissis wrote: > > > On 19/06/2015 11:08 ????, Andrei Marinescu wrote: > > Same here, only 1-2 messages per week, and generally correctly tagged as > > [SPAM]. Way less than the last discussion on this topic produced J > > > > > > > > +1 > > This has been discussed before and Willy expressed the reasons why there > isn't any smap filter in the ML. > > Personally, I am fine with the current setup as gmail does very good job > for filtering spam mails for me.
There *is* a spam filter now, it simply tags SPAM what it finds as such, and does not delete anything (which is fortunate since we've had one or two false positives already). The recent "leds" spams are passing through it for now, let's hope they'll be detected soon. Willy
