Ha ha ! We could also imagine an anti-sarcasm filter. Anyway, that still does not explain why such discussions on spam problems do not occur on other mailman MLs. I get a lot of spam from this ML, and *none* from others, even with a high volume of ham messages.
Hoggins! Le 23/06/2015 14:37, William Lewis a écrit : > As someone that reads the content on this list very regularly, I see next to > no > spam because gmail spam filters in the most part work really well. > Actually someone coming along avery few months and whining about spam is > far more annoying and spammy. Perhaps Willy should add a rule to blacklist > anyone from posting who can’t just get on cope with the fact mailing lists > are > always going to have spam. > >> > On 23 Jun 2015, at 10:32, Hoggins! <fucks...@wheres5.com> wrote: >> > >> > Hello everyone, >> > >> > What surprises me the most is that I'm a subscriber for lots of other >> > mailing-lists, and that's the only one that has a significant amount of >> > spam. >> > On my opinion, the problem is not the antispam filter, it's the right to >> > communicate on that mailing-list. How come a mail such as >> > 3207947...@qq.com is allowed to post things about those damn LED bulbs ? >> > Isn't there a simple way to avoid such noise by just having a whitelist >> > of posters ? >> > >> > Hoggins!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
