Cool, I will test things tonight itself. On Sep 22, 2015 7:49 PM, "Emeric Brun" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 09/21/2015 10:01 PM, Pradeep Jindal wrote: > > Good to know that you were able to reproduce the same, I will wait for > your response while I try to debug it myself as well. Thanks > > > > On Sep 22, 2015 1:26 AM, "Willy Tarreau" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > > > > Pradeep, I reproduce it now, thank you very much for your detailed > > configuration and procedure. I have no idea why it doesn't work > > reliably with this test while it does work with a regular IP address, > > it could be an on-wire protocol issue, I'll wait for Emeric tomorrow > > in the morning and we'll check this together. > > > > All I can say for now is that it *seems* that the first update is > always > > OK in both directions and that after this one only connections sent > to > > the first one who sent the first update continue to work. Maybe > there's > > a state machine bug somewhere, maybe even related to the length of > the > > key or whatever. We'll keep you informed! > > > > Thanks! > > Willy > > > > Hi Pradeep, > > Your config file was useful. We've been able to reproduce several > malfunctions. > > You will find the fixes in attachment. Willy have just merge them in the > git master. > > Could you test with those patches and tell us if they fix your issues. > > R, > Emeric >
