Tested, works like a charm! Thanks - Pradeep Jindal
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Pradeep Jindal <[email protected]> wrote: > Cool, I will test things tonight itself. > On Sep 22, 2015 7:49 PM, "Emeric Brun" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 09/21/2015 10:01 PM, Pradeep Jindal wrote: >> > Good to know that you were able to reproduce the same, I will wait for >> your response while I try to debug it myself as well. Thanks >> > >> > On Sep 22, 2015 1:26 AM, "Willy Tarreau" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> wrote: >> > >> > Pradeep, I reproduce it now, thank you very much for your detailed >> > configuration and procedure. I have no idea why it doesn't work >> > reliably with this test while it does work with a regular IP >> address, >> > it could be an on-wire protocol issue, I'll wait for Emeric tomorrow >> > in the morning and we'll check this together. >> > >> > All I can say for now is that it *seems* that the first update is >> always >> > OK in both directions and that after this one only connections sent >> to >> > the first one who sent the first update continue to work. Maybe >> there's >> > a state machine bug somewhere, maybe even related to the length of >> the >> > key or whatever. We'll keep you informed! >> > >> > Thanks! >> > Willy >> > >> >> Hi Pradeep, >> >> Your config file was useful. We've been able to reproduce several >> malfunctions. >> >> You will find the fixes in attachment. Willy have just merge them in the >> git master. >> >> Could you test with those patches and tell us if they fix your issues. >> >> R, >> Emeric >> >
