On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 07:49:40PM +0100, thierry.fourn...@arpalert.org wrote: > > I see two potential ways forward: > > a) Map['end'] # works right now, but ugly > > b) Map.match_end # intent is much clearer > Hi, thank for you comment ! You're absolutely right. This keyword > doesn't run because it is reserved. The good news is that I can change > the API because, obviously, nobody use this keyword :) Nobody used it until me it seems :-).
> I agree, the solution "a" is ugly, but it is working now. I dont like > the solution "b", because the form of the word is different than other. > > Maybe "suffix" in place of "end", but I prefer the same word that the > word used in haproxy configs. > > I think that I will rename all the match keywords with the prefix > "match_", and keep the old names available, but undocumented for the > backward compatibility. Maybe Willy would considering changing the name of the matches to 'prefix' & 'suffix' instead of 'beg' & 'end', and just keep beg/end as legacy. -- Robin Hugh Johnson E-Mail : robb...@orbis-terrarum.net Home Page : http://www.orbis-terrarum.net/?l=people.robbat2 ICQ# : 30269588 or 41961639 GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
