> Le 14 mars 2017 à 16:28, Emmanuel Hocdet <m...@gandi.net> a écrit : > > Hi Piotr > >> Le 14 mars 2017 à 16:04, Piotr Kubaj <pku...@anongoth.pl> a écrit : >> >> And it seems like the previously attached patches do compile, but the >> warning is there again so now I'm finally including patches that make >> Haproxy both compile and not throw additional warnings. >> > > first patch: > > -#if defined(OPENSSL_IS_BORINGSSL) || (OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER >= 0x1010000fL) > +#if (LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER < 0x2050100fL) && > (defined(OPENSSL_IS_BORINGSSL) || (OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER >= 0x1010000fL)) > should be : > +#if (LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER < 0x2050100fL) || > (defined(OPENSSL_IS_BORINGSSL) || (OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER >= 0x1010000fL)) > > I suspect that test on LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER will not work. > > Manu >
This patch should be SSL version agnostic:
0001-BUILD-ssl-simplify-SSL_CTX_set_ecdh_auto-compatibili.patch
Description: Binary data
