Hello,

We started to use the server-template approach in which you basically
provision servers in backends using a "check disabled" state, then
re-enabling them using the Runtime API.

I recently noticed that when used with dynamic cookies, we end up
getting these warnings:

haproxy.c:149

                        ha_warning("We generated two equal cookies for
two different servers.\n"
                                   "Please change the secret key for
'%s'.\n",
                                   s->proxy->id);

The check seems consistent, but not in the case of disabled servers,
what do you think ?

Pierre

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to