Hi Amit. Please keep the mailing list in loop, thanks.
Am 08.03.2018 um 17:03 schrieb amit raj: > Hello Alex, > > Two things we have to achieve with the HAPROXY. > > 1.There should be no RSTs for closing the connection.(which is happening > when we are keeping option http-keep-alive in ur frontend and backend.) Have you tried this options? https://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/1.8/configuration.html#4-timeout%20server-fin https://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/1.8/configuration.html#4-timeout%20client-fin Why is the RST a problem? > 2.Even load balancing not only with session load balancing also with the > bytes in and bytes out , as you can see on the HAPROXy stats page. > (We have used option-http tunnel for reducing the RST ,but due to this > our even load balancing is screwed up for bytes in and bytes out). Let me describe what I have understood. You want to use more the one balancing decision base. * session (cookie, url, ...) * bytes in. I assume from the client * bytes out. I assume from the client I this right? Please can you describe in a ASCII flow how the decision flow should work. What I have seen in the doc are this acl samples https://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/1.8/configuration.html#7.3.1-table_bytes_in_rate https://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/1.8/configuration.html#7.3.1-table_bytes_out_rate But I'm not sure if this is what you need. > Following our HA proxy config. > > frontend test_ha > bind. :XXXX > option http-tunnel > default_backend test_back > #------------------ > # backend instances > #------------------ > backend test_back > balance roundrobin > option no-http-tunnel > option http-keep-alive > option http-reuse aggresssive That's a short conf and not a working one. Please post the current conf which works, thanks. > Please help us . Best regards Aleks
