This should be it. The only outstanding item was a couple of: if (... != NULL) free(...)
at the bottom. Willy said he'd fix those up when he merged. On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 1:10 PM, Baptiste <bed...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm a bit lost: could you please re-send me the latest version of this > patch? > > Baptiste > > > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 5:02 PM, Ben Draut <dra...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Willy, I think you've reviewed this one already. :) I fixed a few >> things after your review, then you said you just wanted to wait >> for Baptiste to ACK back on 4/27. >> >> I pinged Baptiste independently, just to make sure he had >> seen your note. He replied, but he's been busy too. (Sorry >> to add to the pile!) My understanding was that we're just >> waiting for him. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Ben >> >> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 8:58 AM, Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu> wrote: >> >>> Hi Jim, >>> >>> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 08:50:29AM -0600, Jim Freeman wrote: >>> > I'm not seeing any signs of this feature sliding into 1.9 source - any >>> > danger of it not going in to the current dev branch? >>> > Are there further concerns/problems/... standing in the way ? (it >>> > addresses one of my few haproxy gripes) >>> >>> Sorry but it's my fault. I'm totally overwhelmed at the moment with >>> tons of e-mails that take time to process and that I can't cope with >>> anymore. I already have in my todo list to review Ben's patch and >>> Patrick's patches and I cannot find any single hour to do this. I'm >>> spending some time finishing slides, which are totally incompatible >>> with code review, I'll get back to this ASAP. >>> >>> At least it's not lost at all, and indeed it's not yet in 1.9 but >>> I don't see any reason why this wouldn't go there. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Willy >>> >> >> >
0001-MINOR-config-Implement-parse-resolv-conf-directive.patch
Description: Binary data
