Hello Tim, Sorry for the delayed answer. The segfaults I had experinced apparently were related to something else - Maybe some issue in my env. At first I tried to apply the patch to 1.9.0, but after applying it to 1.8.7, I no longer had the segfaults.
So far I yet haven't experienced the underflow issue again. I think it would be nice to merge this change to next releases - Not sure how this is managed around here without the tracking tool :) BR., Emerson Em sáb, 12 de jan de 2019 às 12:34, Tim Düsterhus <[email protected]> escreveu: > Emerson, > > Am 07.01.19 um 13:40 schrieb Emerson Gomes: > > Just to update you, I have tried the patch, and while I didnt see any new > > occurences of the underflow, HAProxy started to crash constantly... > > > > Jan 07 10:32:37 afrodite haproxy[14364]: [ALERT] 006/103237 (14364) : > > Current worker #1 (14366) exited with code 139 (Segmentation fault) > > Jan 07 10:32:37 afrodite haproxy[14364]: [ALERT] 006/103237 (14364) : > > exit-on-failure: killing every workers with SIGTERM > > Jan 07 10:32:37 afrodite haproxy[14364]: [WARNING] 006/103237 (14364) : > All > > workers exited. Exiting... (139) > > > > I am not sure if the segfaults are related to the patch - Continuing > > investigation... > > > > I only checked whether my patch compiled successfully, but not whether > it actually worked. I did not find the time to take a deeper look yet, > I'm afraid. > > Did you find out, whether the segfaults are caused by the patch and > where exactly it segfaults? > > Best regards > Tim Düsterhus >
