On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 03:30:19PM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote: > I agree with Tim. > > I don't think anyone still deploys "heavily patched 2.4 kernels" and > 2.6.28 is ancient itself, but a dependency. We can just call it Linux > at this point. > > This removes the strange "2628" number which may be confusing, without > introducing build issues by including additional external libraries.
Thanks Lukas as well for this brain storming. Are you fine with my previous proposal of calling the target "linux-glibc" so that we do enable what glibc needs without pretending that everything is enforced by the kernel and creating trouble to other libcs ? thanks, Willy
