On 12 Feb 18:47, Daniel Corbett wrote: > Hello, > > > On 2/12/20 12:55 PM, Tim Düsterhus wrote: > > > > Threading would solve most of the pain points for me, because the emails > > will nicely be merged on both my computer and my phone. For the > > remaining points I don't really care that much. I'll leave this up to > > the people that actually read the emails. I'm currently just marking > > them as read without taking a single look :-) Most of by curiosity is > > satisfied using git and the bug list on haproxy.org. > > > I just wanted to acknowledge this thread and let you know that I appreciate > the suggestions. > > I'll do what I can to improve it starting with working on moving these items > to a thread and increasing the calculations for expected release dates for > older branches. > > I'll also take your other suggestions into account as well but I think these > might be a good starting point. > > I may be a little slow on this but I'll put something together that can > hopefully make the bot more useful. > > > Thanks again, > > -- Daniel
Hi Daniel, I want to tell another story. I find the bot useful and appreciate it. We get more real spam on the mailing list than emails from the bot, and it gives a good reminder about what's coming next and what are the bugs. In the current status of HAProxy development, where lots of things only happen on the mailing list, and branches are not all mirrored on github, this is really welcome. -- (o- Julien Pivotto //\ Open-Source Consultant V_/_ Inuits - https://www.inuits.eu
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
