let us discuss next steps :) Ubuntu, gcc, all features Ubuntu, gcc, ssl=stock both of jobs use stock ssl. do we really need second one (ssl enabled, no other features enabled) ? I would second one (same for clang)
Ubuntu, gcc, gz=slz=1 this one is "slz only, no other features". should we run slz + all features enabled instead ? (same for clang) Ubuntu, gcc, gz=zlib=1 should we drop this one in favour of "gcc all features enabled" ? Ubuntu, gcc, ssl=libressl=3.0.2 I think we can drop this one as well (few things like 51 degree, prometheus, PCRE2 to be discussed later) ср, 11 нояб. 2020 г. в 09:34, Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu>: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 10:30:52PM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote: > (...) > > Let me (or Ilya) know if you have any questions or if you notice any > > issues with it. Personally I'm super happy with how it turned out :-) > > Many thanks to you and Ilya for handling this. I know for having followed > your exchanges that it was not trivial, and I really appreciate that you > entirely offloaded me from this painful task. We'll see how it goes over > the long term, especially if many projects move from Travis to Github > Actions and start to slow things down as we've observed on Travis over > time (let's hope not!). > > I guess we'll soon remove the redundant builds from Travis and only keep > the unusual ones (ppc64, s390x, arm64). > > Cheers, > Willy >
