On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 10:01 AM Willy Tarreau <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 12:58:22PM +0500, ???? ??????? wrote: > > ??, 7 ???. 2021 ?. ? 12:20, Valters Jansons <[email protected]>: > > > On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 12:34 AM Ismail Azerty <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > For some security reasons, our security teams want us to use the > > > > official repository, or recompile the whole project on ubuntu 20. > > > > > > Official Ubuntu repositories are "slow" to update due to LTS policies, > > > ensuring no potentially breaking changes. Focal (20.04) is on 2.0 > > > series, and will not be getting an update to 2.2. > > > > > > > term "official" maybe treated as "ubuntu official" or "haproxy official". > > while "ubuntu official" are indeed slow, vbernat PPA is considered as > > "haproxy official". > > I agree, that's what I was about to add as well. In addition, since he's > also the distro's official maintainer, this should be sufficient to > reassure internal managers who want to use "official packages": Vincent's > builds are the only channel providing timely updates directly from the > distro's maintainer. > > There are extremely few packages that have this luxury, so do not hesitate > and make use of it, like almost everyone else! You'll have less risks of > mistakes than by doing it yourself, you'll benefit from latest fixes, and > even possibly from workarounds should any dirty issue be discovered at > any time.
It was not intended to be disrespectful. I do recognize the important work that is done by ~vbernat, as we also use the PPA by him. My comment for that reason explicitly stated "Official Ubuntu repositories" intending to refer to Ubuntu central ones. Sorry for the potential confusion.
