@Willy Tarreau <[email protected]> , do you think it is good idea to display libc variant in "haproxy -vv" ? (not sure actually whether musl represent itself in recognizable way)
I've found ubuntu musl package, so we can just link to it in CI, for example (I'll try) пт, 11 июн. 2021 г. в 20:03, Илья Шипицин <[email protected]>: > > > пт, 11 июн. 2021 г. в 19:43, William Lallemand <[email protected]>: > >> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 07:09:14PM +0500, Илья Шипицин wrote: >> > I'm against expanding cirrus matrix. cirrus is overloaded already, I'm >> > afraid they will not stay for long time. >> > using custom images in github actions is straightforward, have a look >> > >> > centos 6 · chipitsine/haproxy@20fabcd (github.com) >> > < >> https://github.com/chipitsine/haproxy/commit/20fabcd005dc9e3bac54a84bf44631f177fa79c2 >> > >> > >> > >> > the same way you can specify either alpine or even special prepared >> image. >> > as I recall last time, we decided not to add alpine because "it is >> tested >> > anyway when docker images are created" >> > >> >> As far as I know, it is only built, not tested. We encountered a few >> problems that could have been caught before being built by Docker. >> And that will prevent us to release a version that doesn't work >> correctly with docker before they are built on the docker hub. >> >> >> > also, there's small caveat, github actions runs agent inside docker >> > container, it might have issues with older libc (or musl). >> > but it worth a try >> > >> >> Let's hope it works in this case. >> > > ok, you made my weekend :) > I will try tomorrow. > > also, I can contact github, no idea why they do not link they agents > statically. > > >> >> >> -- >> William Lallemand >> >
