On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 11:30:54AM +0500, ???? ??????? wrote: > > Just thinking about something, given that the new API was already adopted > > by BoringSSL and will probably be at some point in time by LibreSSL, would > > it not be better to have a single macro "HA_SSL_USE_API_V3" or something > > like this that we set based on the various libs' versions, and rely on this > > one for all other defines ? I think it could significantly simplify the > > porting to other libs and avoid a real mess with version numbers > > everywhere. > > > > even BoringSSL states "it adopted upstream changes", it is different in > details, for example ERR_func_error_string > is not deprecated in BoringSSL. > > Well, there might be a common divisor of course. I'll keep an eye on it :) > > as for this particular patch, it is openssl specific (at least now)
OK. I'll let the SSL maintainers deal with this. Thanks! Willy
