вт, 18 окт. 2022 г. в 14:46, William Lallemand <[email protected]>:

> On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 08:54:38AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > Hi Ilya,
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 12:18:40PM +0500, ???? ??????? wrote:
> > > split patches attached.
> >
> > Sorry for the delay. Both applied now, thank you!
> > Willy
> >
>
> Hello,
>
> Sorry I didn't see the first commit that introduced this behavior.  I'm
> not sure we would want to replace the version automatically in the CI
> for OpenSSL.
>

it was supposed behaviour for OPENSSL_VERSION=latest



>
> Currently we are testing the stock OpenSSL of the ubuntu which is 1.1.1,
> the 1.0.2u and the "latest". The latest is currently a 3.0.x but once
> the 3.1.x is released we would still need the 3.0 branch.
>

I think we should review our approach to "stock" and "latest" when
ubuntu-latest
will be 22.04 (it is shipped with 3.0.X)

I'll have a look at your point as well


>
> I think we need something to test the latest release of a branch, and
> not the latest version of all branches. Maybe we could specify "3.0.x"
> to get the latest 3.0?
>

maybe-maybe-maybe.

we can introduce "latest in 3.0.x" I guess. not much to code.


>
> Regards,
>
> --
> William Lallemand
>

Reply via email to