Hi
Viktor Szakáts wrote: > > It would be quite a huge waste of effort if hbide would > reinvent the whole feature set of hbmk2. > > IMO it should be able to create .hbp files for each project > on the fly (from the file lists and options set on the GUI) > and call hbmk2 to do this job. > > Overall I think .xbp file compatibility is unimportant, > but of course hbide could use something similar to store > the file list and options. Ideally it should store these > in .hbp files. This will need a hbmk2 compatible option > parser. > Viktor, you are 100% correct. I do not plan to reinvent the wheels. I want to reuse hbmk2 with .hbc and .hbm formats. I will use .hbp for the native project management scenario. Additionally I will accept .xhp but just one time only at the level of project definition. I assume that hbmk2 does not have .hbp, right ? Regards Pritpal Bedi -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/HBIDE---An-Overview-tp26379927p26413701.html Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
