On Wed, 06 Jan 2010, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: Hi,
> BTW, C++ method override comes directly from QT > homepage, but nevertheless can be wrong or > outdated. Maybe some variations are missing. Or it's possible that new/delete operator overloading works perfectly and the problem is only in our own code and overloaded operators exploit bugs which we have to fix. If the above is true then it's highly possible that replacing malloc()/realloc()/free() by DLMALLOC without USE_DL_PREFIX also works in MinGW builds and the reported problems were caused by our own code. AFAIK so far no one created self contain example without HBQT code which can exploit such problems. best regards, Przemek _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
