> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Viktor Szakáts <harbour...@syenar.hu> wrote: > >> Is this feasible? > > I don't know but please understand that without HB_PP_MULTILINE ( > exactly as it was ) Harbour for me is completely useless. > > Tomorrow I'll do a meeting with my developers to decide what to do.
For now I moved this on compiler level, which makes it possible to use a standard build with a simple compiler switch. IOW it makes your life easier. Now it causes only a minor overhead in PP code, so technically it's not a big problem, but I'd still like have a proper solution here, since storing free form string inside the source code seems like a valid problem, but the current solution is just a pile of ad-hoc hacks, and this is IMO not very good situation. (neither -kl nor #pragma). BTW -kl (aka "PP multiline strings") has one ugly bad side-effect, it will also include all indentation spaces in compiled pcode, I know that storage and memory is cheap, but it doesn't look very good. The other bit which looks strange is that #pragma __cstream needs to be closed with command ENDTEXT, I'd expect something like #pragma __cstreamend or similar. Brgds, Viktor _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
