Przemysław Czerpak wrote:
>
> You may need explicit destructors in .prg code only if you plan to
> keep some structures which are not released automatically in harbour
> object. If you correctly implement releasing all QT objects by automatic
> GC pointer item destructors then you will not need any PRG level
> destructors to replicate the same job.
>
Instead of all the protections in hbQT's GC pointer items destruction
we are still unable to grasp a logic why for some variables behavior
is indifferent. I mean we are never sure which another child is
destroyed by Qt with its parent and prevent the latter not to
be sent to GC engine.
> BTW the only one thing which should be introduced yet is an option to
> mark GC pointer items as attached to other QT structures so they should
> not be released automatically with the HVM item because they will be
> released with parent object.
>
Few days before I had resuested for this feature, though I admit,
I could not explain that in as simple language as above of your paragraph.
If possible, please do it.
-----
enjoy hbIDEing...
Pritpal Bedi
http://hbide.vouch.info/
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/Pritpal-and-Vikto-please-test-this-generator-tp4900883p4907702.html
Sent from the harbour-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
