If you put the condition on the command, it controls the entire
command, while the argument's condition further refines it. One way I
could see doing it, would be to factor out a common AND term to the
command condition. Greg Woodhouse wrote: How about both? I personally pefer the command:condition syntax. I think someone (Maury?) posted a reason why it may be preferable to postconditionalize the argument, but I don't recall what it was.--- Kevin Toppenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On this same topic... which is correct? Option 1: goto:(i>1) SomeLabel or Option 2: goto SomeLabel:(i>1) According to what is writen below, I would think Option 2, but I found the following line in XUP that looks like option 1. if ($get(DUZ)'>0)!(('$data(DUZ(0)))) do ASKDUZ^XUP goto:Y'>0 XUPAbort thanks Kevin --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Your intuition is correct. only three Standard MUMPS commands have postconditional operators that apply to their arguments.The DO command, the GOTO command, and the XECUTE command.Quick question: if I see a command like this: DO RTN1,RTN2,RTN3:(A>1) Then does the postconditional operator affect the calling of functions RTN1 & RTN2 & RTN3, or justRTN3?I think it is just RTN3 Thanks Kevin __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. www.yahoo.com-------------------------------------------------------This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download nowfor FREELinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for bestdatabase on Linux.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click_______________________________________________ Hardhats-members mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members-------------------------------------------------------This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click_______________________________________________ Hardhats-members mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free! http://my.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Hardhats-members mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members===== A practical man is a man who practices the errors of his forefathers. --Benjamin Disraeli ==== Greg Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Hardhats-members mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members -- Greg Kreis http://www.PioneerDataSys.com "The future is here. It's just not widely distributed yet." -William Gibson |
- Re: [Hardhats-members] Easy M syntax question Kevin Toppenberg
- Re: [Hardhats-members] Easy M syntax question Greg Woodhouse
- Re: [Hardhats-members] Easy M syntax question Greg Kreis
- Re: [Hardhats-members] Easy M syntax questio... Kevin Toppenberg
- Re: [Hardhats-members] Easy M syntax questio... Greg Woodhouse
- Re: [Hardhats-members] Easy M syntax questio... John Leo Zimmer
- Re: [Hardhats-members] Easy M syntax que... Greg Woodhouse