I believe that is legitimate, too. --- John Leo Zimmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about? > > GOTO:X>0 Label1:Y>1,Label2:Z>1,Label3 > > in leu of... > > IF X>0 goto @(S$(Y>1:"Label1",Z>1:"Label2",1:"Label3")) > > I've been advised to stick to human disease and pestilence and to > leave MUMPS > alone. :-) > > > > ---------- Original Message ----------- > From: Greg Kreis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 22:25:10 -0500 > Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Easy M syntax question > > > If you put the condition on the command, it controls the entire > > command, while the argument's condition further refines it. One > way > > I could see doing it, would be to factor out a common AND term to > > the command condition. > > > > Greg Woodhouse wrote: > > > > >How about both? > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real > users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Hardhats-members mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members > ===== A practical man is a man who practices the errors of his forefathers. --Benjamin Disraeli ==== Greg Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Hardhats-members mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
