In fact, I think this work is quite interesting, especially since it seems to have quite an affinity with an area in which I have a particular interest (applications of formal logic to computation and modeling of complex systems). But at this stage, it isn't clear to me how these ideas can be applied to achieve interoperability at the EHR level. One thing that appeals to me about CCR is that it is actually relatively simple. On the other hand, I can see how knowledge representation would be useful in attempts to apply techniques of AI like automated planning or inference systems to medicine -- something that seems like quite an interesting avenue for research -- but creating interoperable EHRs seems to be a bit more "down to earth".

===
Gregory Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"Before one gets the right answer, one must ask the right question." -- S. Barry Cooper


On Jun 13, 2005, at 7:22 PM, Kevin Toppenberg wrote:

OK.  So it would be most helpful to do one's XML
export using tags that everyone agrees on.  But this
is apparently still an evolving area, where consensus
has not been reached.

So in the mean time, I think I will try to design a my
XML export system such that the end user can choose to
simply use the data labels for individual fields, or
optionally specify different XML tags.

Kevin


--- Greg Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:


Everybody does seem to be getting. I just went to
OMG to download the
MOF standard, and notice that on their main page
they are talking about
their involvement with EHR standards, too. Of
course, there is HL7 who,
in addition to the RIM and CDA has an EHR-S effort
underway. I know
about CCR, but it's only a small part of what ASTM
is doing. I've been
looking at the OpenEHR web site, but am still trying
to digest it at
see if I can get a handle on what is genuinely new
about archetypes. I
think the language is a bit confusing, because in
mathematical logic,
ontologies typically refer to what is left if you
omit contingent
information from your model (actually a model is
basically an ontology
+ contingent information).

--- "A. Forrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


There are ASTM standards on the  Structure and

Conent of the EHR that

are
consistent with ADA standards on the EHR; These

are conceptual

content
standards that have had historic support of AHIMA.

Thye also have

some
consistency with HL7 messaaging structures and

have been in touch

with the
Open EHR folks. Efforts are underway to reactivate

a dilaog that

began in
1995 on a "Common Data Model" but subsequently

many went of to play

"king
of the Mountain" in their pigeonholes. A key issue

currently is to

map the
"Continuity of Care Record - CCR" to the existing

EHR models and then

to
VistA. VistA has a lot of representing and EHR as

a series of text

(date-timed) but the recent Report of the ONCHIT

clealry noted to

tension
be tween structured models for the EHR and those

for structured text(


which is just electronic represntation of paper

record notes). WHat

is of
interest for VistA is what its eveolutionary

trajectory will be with

respect to this conceptual content and how it will

fit into the

"business
model" of healthcare which ( according to IOM

2003) is patient

Centered
care and Multidisciplinary teams; Resource

Management is supportive

and
enabling but has had prime focus for 40 yrs (at

least). economists

have
noted that when healthacre recognbizes that the

business model for

healthcare in not that of a supermarket it will

progress. A key

question:
Is the DVA now using a Supermarket Model and

worrying about

Technology as
prime focus or is it really (as the 2005

Person-Centered heslth

record
Book tries to say) looking at the REAL Healthcare

business model?

Time
will tell.


On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Joseph Dal Molin wrote:


Greg have you looked into the OpenEHR

initiative....it is

attempting to

develop a usable EHR standard.

Joseph

Greg Woodhouse wrote:

Of course, if you just dump the progress notes

to a file, won't

they

still be in a "proprietary" format? It seems

that what you need is

an

EHR standard that supports interoperability.

This is where I hope

to go

with Triton and/or Orpheus.

--- Kevin Toppenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



I want the practice to be able to say, we

don't want

to use VistA anymore, dump all the progress

notes to a

DVD so we can import them into another system.

Kevin


--- "Gillon, Joseph"

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:




I assume you know about the RPC to get notes

by

patient/provider for a given
time interval, and you need something else?

-----Original Message-----
From:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]








[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



On Behalf Of Kevin
Toppenberg
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 4:13 PM
To: Hardhats Sourceforge
Subject: [Hardhats-members] XML data export

One of my goals for my site has been the

ability to

get data back out of VistA in a painless

manner. For

me this means XML. And I am rapidly nearing

the

point
where I plan on finishing this project.

I have a couple of approaches I could take,

and I'd

like input from the list

1. Write a custom program that dumps progress

notes

(currently the only unique data being stored

in our

VistA) in XML format.  I think I could very

easily

do
this.

2. Writing an extension to fileman's data

export

abilities, to include an option for XML.

This would

be the better option in the long run, but

probably

would be a good deal more difficult for me.

I would

need to fully understand the current system

to

decide
how best to integrate.  Usha recently posted

about

her
difficulty using the export functions.  I

don't

think
anyone responded with an answer.

What do export templates do?  What file are

they

stored in?

Has anyone else already done this?  Anything

I

should
know before I rush off to reinvent the wheel?

Thanks
Kevin






=== message truncated ===




__________________________________
Discover Yahoo!
Get on-the-go sports scores, stock quotes, news and more. Check it out!
http://discover.yahoo.com/mobile.html


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. How far can you shotput a projector? How fast can you ride your desk chair down the office luge track?
If you want to score the big prize, get to know the little guy.
Play to win an NEC 61" plasma display: http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
_______________________________________________
Hardhats-members mailing list
Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.  How far can you shotput
a projector? How fast can you ride your desk chair down the office luge track?
If you want to score the big prize, get to know the little guy. Play to win an NEC 61" plasma display: http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
_______________________________________________
Hardhats-members mailing list
Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members

Reply via email to