I think it will pick the first one. BTW, I know configuring BIND sounds like work you'd rathert not do, but there are a lot advantages to running DNS on your LAN.
--- Thurman Pedigo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The message below makes sense. By the same token, would the following > configuration have problems resolving? > > 67.104.173.198 vistasrv > 127.0.0.1 localhost > 38.113.0.251 vistasrv > > Does VistA require resolving to "vistasrv", or will it resolve to > another > name (such as "worksrv")? As in the following: > 67.104.173.198 vistasrv > 127.0.0.1 localhost > 38.113.0.251 worksrv > > And: > We use DNS for WWW only, not our LAN. Does that impact the above > configuration? > > I think I am starting to get it. > > Thanks, > > thurman > === Gregory Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Design quality doesn't ensure success, but design failure can ensure failure." --Kent Beck ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ Hardhats-members mailing list Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
