You do know about the Fileman Delphi vcomponents, don't you? Obviously,
they're of no use if you're not using Delphi, but VistA does include a
set of controls analogous to Delphi'sa data controls for relational
DBMSs (How do you pronounce that?)

--- Kevin Toppenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Rusty,
> 
> Just for the record, I think a screenman-like
> interface for editing fields would be great. 
> Especially if it was a dynamic form.  Unless you write
> it, though.  I don't see it happening.
> 
> Kevin
> 
> 
> --- TMaynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Thanks once again ...another object shortcut that I
> > havent seen in the HTML 
> > manuals(beginning,advanced,or programmer).
> >   The presentation of this array ^?? is essentially
> > what I referred in an 
> > earlier post:
> > "Since Fileman has routines to parse and present
> > fieldnames in roll/scroll
> > dialogs,it would be a treat to receive that same
> > info on a silver platter"
> > (the silver platter being a default Screenman-like
> > form that could be toggled to 
> >   various sortings)
> >     I am ruminating on this feature for omnibus
> > access, while Thom H. has placed 
> > that in perspective with the greater use of
> > production templates. I suppose 
> > Fileman in management and learning provokes some of
> > my sort of newcomer 
> > reactions ...so perhaps I need to move attention
> > over to Screenman and (leaving 
> > input) I have hardly scratched the surface of
> > reporting tools.
> > 
> > Rusty Maynard
> > 
> > Cameron Schlehuber wrote:
> > > BTW, if you type "^??" at any prompt where you
> > have multiple fields
> > > available to be edited, FileMan will echo to you a
> > list of the field choices
> > > by field number as well as name (e.g. you can type
> > "^.01" to go back to the
> > > primary field in a record, or "^NAME" (if the
> > field is called "NAME")).
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Behalf Of Holloway,
> > > Thomas (EDS)
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 1:09 PM
> > > To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] Roll/Scroll
> > changes for Fileman
> > > 
> > > Rusty said: "When using a default "All Fields"
> > edit, your are tacitly saying
> > > ...let the 
> > >   iteration of every next field be my picklist
> > ...and onward."
> > > 
> > > Rusty,
> > >    While this is true, you should almost never be
> > doing this in a production
> > > environment.  You should use existing options for
> > 99.5% of your data entry
> > > needs.  The routines and Input Templates that have
> > been prepared for each
> > > package are designed with built-in business and
> > database rules that might be
> > > violated if using FM in "All Fields" mode.  Once
> > you are familiar with a
> > > given application and the relationship between all
> > affected files and
> > > fields, you can create your own Input Templates
> > and link them to Options
> > > that you create.  
> > > 
> > > Thom H.
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Behalf Of TMaynard
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 3:57 PM
> > > To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Roll/Scroll
> > changes for Fileman
> > > 
> > > Thanks for this tip Cameron.
> > > Editing in Fileman without it is like a mailman
> > whose vehicle has no reverse
> > > 
> > > gear. When using a default "All Fields" edit, your
> > are tacitly saying ...let
> > > the 
> > >   iteration of every next field be my picklist
> > ...and onward.
> > > (of course mailmen are skilled at stopping
> > correctly at each mailbox,rarely
> > > need 
> > >   reverse, and they even presort so their mail is
> > delivered in the
> > > proverbial 
> > > sequence)  I can understand how staff using well
> > known menus can be very
> > > swift 
> > > with roll/scroll being like a mailman who knows
> > the routes.
> > >    The diversity of newcomers to OpenVista or
> > VistaOffice  are the reason
> > > for 
> > > the questions of my previous posts on this thread.
> > What are the new
> > > ergonomic 
> > > tools for settings where Vista  is used by staff
> > who are traversing many
> > > menus 
> > > as newcomers or multitasking? It seems to me that
> > these new installations in
> > > 
> > > various private settings will have the double task
> > of learning what's there
> > > and 
> > > devising their own menus to reflect their
> > patterns.
> > >    If Fileman is the engine for  all this
> > adaptation, then this seems to beg
> > > for 
> > > new features to Fileman,  regardless of which
> > menus and files are modified
> > > or 
> > > created. ( I don't think everything needs a rich
> > GUi like CPRS).
> > >    I am far from having proficiency in using
> > what's already there, but I
> > > still 
> > > have to ask what is on the horizon to be added?
> > > 
> > > Rusty Maynard
> > > 
> > > Cameron Schlehuber wrote:
> > > 
> > >>Rusty, you state:  "and either way there is no
> > option to backup (or
> > > 
> > > re-edit)
> > > 
> > >>any one of the fields, as each field must be
> > edited in sequence"
> > >>
> > >>Actually, you can "jump" to any field by
> > pre-pending the circumflex "^" in
> > >>front of the field name (or first part of the
> > name) you wish to jump to
> > > 
> > > ...
> > > 
> > >>backwards or forwards.  (So long as the "NO^" flag
> > hasn't been set by the
> > >>programmer.)
> > >>
> > >>Cameron Schlehuber
> > >>
> > >>-----Original Message-----
> > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Behalf Of
> > > 
> > > TMaynard
> > > 
> > >>Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 1:16 PM
> > >>To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
> > >>Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Roll/Scroll
> > changes for Fileman
> > >>
> > >>Mouse navigation would be handy for working with
> > large and crowded
> > > 
> > > Screenman
> > > 
> > >>templates which is all well and good, for when a
> > form has been composed
> > > 
> > > for
> > > 
> > >>a 
> > >>frequently used view of data input or display.
> > >>  But I don't understand why Fileman doesnt have a
> > default Screenman-like
> > >>form 
> > >>for *every* dialog in which Fileman awaits
> > multiple input responses.
> > >>   Whether editing or inquiring into selected
> > fields,only the most
> > > 
> > > familiar
> > > 
> > >>user 
> > >>can rattle off a long list of fields for
> > editing.Most have to query "?" to
> > > 
> > > 
> > >>review the list of fields,then up arrow "^" to
> > enter them manually at the 
> > >>prompt. Editing more than a dozen fields, it is
> > almost as easy to elect to
> > >>edit 
> > 
> === message truncated ===
> 
> 
> 
>               
> ____________________________________________________
> Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs 
>  
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration
> Strategies
> from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
> informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
> speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Hardhats-members mailing list
> Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
> 



===
Gregory Woodhouse  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

"Design quality doesn't ensure success, but design failure can ensure failure."

--Kent Beck








-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
Hardhats-members mailing list
Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members

Reply via email to