----- Original Message ----- From: "Kevin Toppenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2005 12:00 PM Subject: [Hardhats-members] Re: more M read questions
> Maury, > > Thanks for your feedback. I agree that they byte-by-byte approach > will have to be changed. > > I am doing it for a couple of reasons. First, I think it is a severe > limitation of Kernel if it can't read in a binary file. > Reading, storing, transmitting -- all very different issues. > Second, because I want to allow the server to send CPRS, or other > imaging client, a binary file (i.e. an image), without the client > having to be given filesystem access to the image server. It should > save setup hassles, and also increase security. > Fair enough. Add a RPC call to do this instead of worrying about reading and storing the data within VistA. Something like FTP (or one of its secure cousins) could be subverted. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Hardhats-members mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
