I think I disagree. This type of dialog is needed to establish the requirements that must be met by *medical applications*, but what characteristics a language, operating system, or other platform must have to allow systemas to be built meeting those requirements without unreasonable difficulty is a separate question.
For example, MUMPS is a dynamically scoped language. Are you sugggesting that it is necessary to consult with medical professionals to decide whether an application would most suitably be developed in a statically scoped language or one that supports (even requires) dynamic scoping. --- "A. Forrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ruben: > There must be a level of dialog with the health Professional > disciplines > that may embrace this technology; they dont need detailed technical > say > but they do need dialog. === Gregory Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Design quality doesn't ensure success, but design failure can ensure failure." --Kent Beck ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Hardhats-members mailing list Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
