It's not the Mac per se. Lately, I haven't been terrible sanguine about
running Linux and am much more interested in running OS X myself, but
that's a different issue from whether a business case could be made for
running on the platform. Philosophically, I wish there were more
emphasis on building a product that could be run on a variety of
platfroms (proprietary or open source) than on one particular platform,
but I think that puts me in the minority here. Having said that, I
certainly don't fault Fidelity for not making GT.M open source on
platforms other than Linux. In fact, I was very concerned that my post
would be taken as a criticism of Fidelity for just that reason. 

--- "K.S. Bhaskar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Greg --
> 
> Thank you for your comments, as well as all the support you provide
> to
> members of this forum.  Let me respond to your inputs:
> 
> GT.M has so few dependencies that it runs on every current release of
> every major distribution of x86 GNU/Linux that I know of.  It has
> been
> run on SuSE, Gentoo, Debian, Red Hat, Fedora, Slackware, Mandriva...
> There are too many Linux distributions for us to keep running in
> house
> and hence to support.  If you hear of a Linux distribution on which
> it
> doesn't run, please bring it to my attention.
> 
> It is possible to get GT.M (and hence VistA) to run on *BSD on x86
> hardware (it has been reported as being done, and I previously posted
> links).  Sometimes I just have to make hard decisions about where
> I/we
> can spend the time providing support - since it not possible to even
> keep up with Linux distributions.
> 
> There is already GT.M for Sun SPARC Solaris, HP PA-RISC HP-UX, and HP
> Alpha/AXP OpenVMS.  However, it is not open source free software (it
> is
> more traditionally licensed, and always more reasonably priced than
> alternatives, but not free).  I would be happy to make available
> VistA
> on GT.M on any of those, or other supported, platforms on a free
> trial
> license to anyone who wants to evaluate it, but ultimately a GT.M
> license will need to be purchased.  [Yes, go ahead, question my
> sanity.
> Why do I so vigorously advocate GT.M on x86 GNU/Linux where there is
> no
> license revenue?  Sometimes my management does too...]
> 
> Since we have a GT.M for IBM pSeries AIX, it would be easy for us to
> provide a GT.M for Mac OS X if there is a market demand.  But I can't
> make a credible business case to my executive management for an open
> source free GT.M on Mac OS X.  If anyone feels that they could deploy
> a
> reasonable number of VistA systems on Mac OS X, please contact me off
> line.
> 
> I think that covers all major computing platforms.
> 
> No, wait, I forgot.  Isn't there something for commodity hardware
> from a
> small software company in the other Washington?  Called something
> like
> Windows?
> 
> Humor aside, I wish I could say more at this time about GT.M on
> Microsoft Windows, but I can't.  For the moment, yes, I am seriously
> thinking about an OpenVistA VivA based on Colinux+Debian or
> Puppy+QEMU.
> 
> -- Bhaskar
> 
> On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 00:29 -0500, Gregory Woodhouse wrote:
> > I assume your basic goal is to come up with something like a turn
> > key   
> > solution. Is that a fair assumption? Going back to the network
> > effect   
> > message, I don't know that marrying your solution to Debian,
> > Knoppix,   
> > Red Hat, or what have you is the right way to go. It will be easier
>   
> > to get user "buy in" if the users feel they can use their favorite 
>  
> > Linux distribution (or, while we're at it: What about Solaris,
> > HP/UX,   
> > OS X, (Free|Open|Net)BSD, OpenDarwin, OpenVMS, or even Windows)? 
> > === 
> > Gregory Woodhouse 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > "A practical man is a man who practices the errors of his   
> > forefathers. -- Benjamin Disraeli
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
> September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle
> Practices
> Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing
> & QA
> Security * Process Improvement & Measurement *
> http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
> _______________________________________________
> Hardhats-members mailing list
> Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
> 



===
Gregory Woodhouse  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



"Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more
to add, but when there is nothing left to take away."
-- Antoine de Saint-Exupery











-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Hardhats-members mailing list
Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members

Reply via email to