Gregory wrote:
>How can you demonstrate the interleaving of jobs without disturbing
>it with explicit synchronization?
>JOB BODY("A")
>JOB BODY("B")
>
>where BODY is just a FOR loop
>
>BODY(X) ;
> FOR I=1:1:25 WRITE X
>QUIT
>
>But, of course that's not allowed, because background jobs can't
>write to the terminal. A natural idea is to use a host file instead,
>but then the test would say more about output buffering than anything
>else.
>
>Does anyone have any ideas?
Greg, I am not sure what the point of this is, but try it from a local xterm in
GT.M.
I think you will get the effect you are looking for.
---------------------------------------
Jim Self
Systems Architect, Lead Developer
VMTH Computer Services, UC Davis
(http://www.vmth.ucdavis.edu/us/jaself)
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Hardhats-members mailing list
Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
