On Feb 19, 2006, at 6:28 PM, Gary Monger wrote:
Unless there will be actual interconnection with these systems,
they could
all be called the same. If a small range of institution numbers
were set
aside, it should cover anything short of a hospital chain.
I don't think it's quite that simple (unfortunately) because you have
to consider "indirect" connections, like buying from the same vendor,
too. Nevertheless, your point about setting aside private numbers is
a good one. I've thought that reserving 999 for non-connected systems
(for example) might be a good idea, though I haven't really thought
through all the implications of doing this.
===
Gregory Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"You must unlearn what you have learned."
--Yoda
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Hardhats-members mailing list
Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
