You are absolutely right that I am very interested.  Do you have any objection 
to my posting this on the Hardhats mailing list?

On Saturday 25 March 2006 11:36, Bill Walton wrote:
Hi Nancy,

Thought you might be interested in a couple of links I came across a while
back while looking into the drug interaction database question.

Best regards,
Bill

http://www.drugref.org/

http://www.e-mds.com/emds/prodserv/drugdb.html


----- Original Message -----
From: "Nancy Anthracite" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: 2006-03-25 9:42 AM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Pharmacy question: matching ingredients

> I think that Mark Amundson's business will provide this service for those

who

> wish to purchase it.
>
> The whole question of drug interactions is an interesting one.  There are
> databases one can purchase, but when it comes to implementing them, this

is

> an issue which virtually all medical records systems in large hospitals,
> particularly teaching hospitals, wrestle with.  The severity of the
> interaction is rated by the company distributing the database, but I

gather

> the majority of the time there is not even close to unanimity of opinion
> about the advisability of using their rating system to generate an alert
> since the severity of the interaction does not always match the clinical
> importance of it.
>
> Since most systems that pop up an alert will expect an entry to explain

the

> over-ride, they don't want to harass their physicians with marginally

helpful

> alerts or alerts they do not feel rise to the level of necessitating this
> sort of added interaction.
>
> Generally there is a process established where folks can recommend alerts

and

> then there are one or more levels of review committees set up to determine
> what will go into the record system and also accept feedback and evaluate

how

> well they work.  This is true for things other than drug interactions as
> well, such as reminders.
>
> As far as I know, the VA does its own interaction testing and own entries
> which involve an entry and a double check by a different person to be sure
> the orderable item file is correct.  I don't know it for sure, but I

suspect

> there are committees like the ones I mentioned above at the VA.
>
> This whole question is a big one for the reasons Kevin has already cited

and

> especially because of VOE.  VOE will go out the door with a drugs and
> interactions, but how will this be maintained? It was populated with an
> existing database, but will that continue?  I am not aware of any plans to
> see that it will or of attempts being made to seek the cooperation of the

VA

> in doing it.  That does not mean it hasn't happened.  I just have not

heard

> about it.
>
> So I would guess that Mark's business prospects should be quite good.

Let's

> hope that he prices his services reasonably.
>
> On Saturday 25 March 2006 08:36, Kevin Toppenberg wrote:
> I have a question for the pharmacists on the message board:
>
> As I am processing the 280,000 entries in the FDA database, I am
> matching first by NDC.  If that fails, I then have a drug that
> potentially needs to be added to the VA PRODUCT file.
>
> In order for the drug to work with drug-interaction testing later, the
> drug INGREDIENTS of the new addtion need to match with existing VistA
> ingredients.  But here lies my problem.  A great many drugs fail to
> match ingredients.
>
> Here is one example:
>
> FDA: ceftazidime pentahydride
> VistA: ceftazidime
>
> In this example, I feel fairly comfortable matching these.  But if I
> make a rule that says, "if simple comparison doesn't match, then allow
> matching based on FIRST word only", then I worry that I will create a
> match between two ingredients that shouldn't be matched.
>
> So my question is: Is this worry valid?  Are there ingredients where
> the second or third words DO MAKE A DIFFERENCE?
>
> Next, there are going to be new substances/ingredients that have been
> released by the FDA that have not previously been put into the VA
> PRODUCT file, or the INGREDIENTS file.  For example, Spiriva
> (tiotropium), I don't know if this is in my VA PRODUCT file or not,
> but let's assume it is new enough that it is not already there.  To
> add this as a new drug, I will need to add a new ingredient,
> TIOTROPIUM.
>
> But then what about the DRUG INTERACTIONS functionality?  I haven't
> studied this part yet, but I assume there is a file somewhere that
> lists drug interactions and ingredients that cause them.  If I don't
> have drug interaction data for new drugs, but do have it for old
> drugs, then providers will have a system that only works some of the
> time --> dangerous.  In the VA system, I assume that new drugs are
> added one at a time by a pharmacist, on an as-needed basis.
>
> Question: Where do they get their information about drug interactions?
>  There must be some database that they access, which should be
> continually updated.  If so, is this a commercial product, or is it
> public and I could download it somewhere?
>
> I guess another option would be to simply add the new ingredients and
> then shut off the drug interaction system so that no warnings are
> generated (rather than just some of the time), and we would have the
> same situation as we do now, where doctors write prescriptions on
> paper and the pharmacist at the pharmacy fills the order (and *might*
> do some interaction checking).  This is not a bad solution...
>
> Perhaps my work to automatically add missing drugs from the FDA
> database has been doomed from the start because there is not enough
> data there.  (Other missing data is the maximum and minum doses,
> though I think our site can get by without this.)  But frankly, the
> pharmacy system can't work if the doctors can't order ANY drug.  And I
> feel I have established that we are not going to be able to tap into
> the up-to-date VA PRODUCT file maintained by the VA somewhere.  And
> even this will not likely contain ALL the drugs (i.e. pediatric drugs,
> birth control tablets, labor & delivery drugs etc etc.)
>
> Your thoughts would be appreciated
>
> Kevin
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting

language

> that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live

webcast

> and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding

territory!

> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642
> _______________________________________________
> Hardhats-members mailing list
> Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
>
> --
> Nancy Anthracite
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting

language

> that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live

webcast

> and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding

territory!

> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> Hardhats-members mailing list
> Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members

-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Hardhats-members mailing list
Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members

-- 
Nancy Anthracite


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Hardhats-members mailing list
Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members

Reply via email to