Um, that was in PA
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051220/ap_on_re_us/evolution_debate;_ylt=AljvGW5ztswbPct.PdjhbU6s0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA3MzV0MTdmBHNlYwM3NTM-
At 12/20/2005 01:55 PM, G.Waleed Kavalec wrote:
Excellent.
Good religion knows that science is just a camera.
Good science lets religion tell them what not to do with the shiny uranium
sphere.
On 12/20/05, Brian Weeden
<<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20051220-5807.html>http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20051220-5807.html
Quote:
"(1) ID violates the centuries-old ground rules of science by invoking
and permitting supernatural causation; (2) the argument of irreducible
complexity, central to ID, employs the same flawed and illogical
contrived dualism that doomed creation science in the 1980's; and (3)
ID's negative attacks on evolution have been refuted by the scientific
community."
Chalk one up for the good guys.
--
Brian
--
G. Waleed Kavalec
-------------------------
Why are we all in this handbasket
and where is it going so fast?
<http://www.kavalec.com/thisisislam.swf>http://www.kavalec.com/thisisislam.swf
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.1/207 - Release Date: 12/19/2005
