So suggestions for a cheap card that would work well? On 3/26/06, Chris Reeves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Because it's not a DX9 card. MS put into MCE designs for video support by > using Video Mixing Renderer Filter 9 as it's base renderer. MCE is the ONLY > windows OS to use VMR9 at it's heart, as all other OS do not use it; and > even MCE only uses it inside the 10' interface. > > But in the MCE interface, it relies on VMR9 to do all rendering work - and > that requires DirectX9 compatibility. > > Links for more info: > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Weeden > Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 11:42 PM > To: The Hardware List > Subject: Re: [H] Interesting MCE bug > > On 3/25/06, Jin-Wei Tioh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Wait a minute... you're running MCE 2005 withe GF4 Ti4400? > > Thought that wasn't possible (seeing as MCE 2005 uses VMR 9). > > > > Wouldn't the minimum be a GeForce FX or 9x00 (x=5,6,7,8)? > > > > It's a perfectly fine video card with onboard MPEG-2 processing. More > than what SHOULD be needed for simply playing DVDs and video files. > Why wouldn't it be supported? > > > -- > Brian > >
-- Brian
