I've often wondered how they can call Home Basic Vista also, though. Let's see, missing features:
* No Aero * No backup to anything but local * No DirectX10 * Doesn't come with new Vista games and themes * Windows Vista Meeting not present * Media Center not present (OK, that's an add on) I mean, wipe out all those features, and really, do you have Vista or basically XP Home SP3? -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Ruset Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 11:30 AM To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com Subject: Re: [H] Vista class action This is absolutely the most retarded thing I've ever read: "These common issues ... are whether Vista Home Basic, in truth, can fairly be called 'Vista' and whether Microsoft's 'Windows Vista Capable' marketing campaign inflated demand market-wide for 'Windows Vista Capable' PCs," she wrote. Why the hell would you not call Vista Home Basic "Vista?" And since when has there been market demand for Vista at all? If anything, Vista has put XP in more demand. I hate lawyers. Chris Reeves wrote: > http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/352442_vista23.html > Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T >
