Well, everyone has their preferred way of doing things. I like
Exchange/Outlook the best for me ( currently working to put together a
server to host my own domain at home ). At my last job, I was a
Domino/Notes Admin ( along with being A network Admin ) and while I think
Outlook works better then Notes as an email client, Notes does bring some
interesting groupware capacity to the dance. But for *me* I don't like
web based email clients, I find them slow, clunky and I rarely use them.
Regards,
Gary
At 06:11 AM 6/6/2009, It was written by Brian Weeden that this shall come
to pass:
Frankly, I don't understand why anyone still uses Outlook or any other stand
alone email client.
---
Brian
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 9:32 PM, FORC5 <fuf...@cox.net> wrote:
> Hope not
>
> fp
>
> At 05:50 PM 6/5/2009, Winterlight Poked the stick with:
> >At 03:25 PM 6/5/2009, you wrote:
> >>Email has had to evolve over the years. What worked 5 years ago
> >>may not work today. AT&T/Yahoo has been shifting over to newer
> >>servers that require SSL and high-numbered ports (465/995).
> >>They are not alone. Comcast has gradually been dropping all support
> >>for port 25 SMTP. These changes in email standards are being
> >>mandated by the newer RFCs and the ever increasing onslaught of
> >>spammers and phishers.
> >
> >I think that it is just a matter of time until we all have to use online
> web interface email unless you are using something like Outlook tied into
> Hotmail.
> >
>
> --
> Tallyho ! ]:8)
> Taglines below !
> --
> One day I'm a windshield, the next day a bug thereon.
>
>
