Lightweight and Free are certainly good.
But, does anyone have any feedback on how effective MSE is compared
to some of the other AV/AM progies?
-Mike
At 03:40 PM 1/5/2010, Anthony A. Riederer wrote:
I have to agree here. Which with a Microsoft product is surprising.
Lightweight and free. Who would have thunk it.
Tony
-----Original Message-----
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
[mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Brian Weeden
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 1:47 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Cc: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 Firewall
MSE has two big features that are important to me: free and
lightweight/unobtrusive.
-----------
Brian
Sent from my iPhone
On 2010-01-05, at 11:37 AM, JRS <stei...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> I've had good luck with MSE as well, and it did well in tests I saw
> against Norton and McAfee, catching more
> virii than either of the others.
>
>
>
>>
>> Wow! At least get Microsoft Security Essentials. Its free and
>> works pretty
>> well in tests I do at work.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Tim Lider
>> Sr. Data Recovery Specialist
>> Advanced Data Solutions, LLC
>> http://www.adv-data.com
>>
>>
__________________________________________
"Those who desire to give up freedom in order to gain security, will
not have, nor do they deserve, either one." - Benjamin Franklin
