I've been ple*santly surprised by its ability to remove infection if installed on a hosed box. That to me is always a tough test Sent via BlackBerry
-----Original Message----- From: Michael Resnick <mike...@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:07:44 To: <hardware@hardwaregroup.com> Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 Firewall Lightweight and Free are certainly good. But, does anyone have any feedback on how effective MSE is compared to some of the other AV/AM progies? -Mike At 03:40 PM 1/5/2010, Anthony A. Riederer wrote: >I have to agree here. Which with a Microsoft product is surprising. >Lightweight and free. Who would have thunk it. > >Tony >-----Original Message----- >From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com >[mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Brian Weeden >Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 1:47 PM >To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com >Cc: hardware@hardwaregroup.com >Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 Firewall > >MSE has two big features that are important to me: free and >lightweight/unobtrusive. > >----------- >Brian > >Sent from my iPhone > >On 2010-01-05, at 11:37 AM, JRS <stei...@pacbell.net> wrote: > > > I've had good luck with MSE as well, and it did well in tests I saw > > against Norton and McAfee, catching more > > virii than either of the others. > > > > > > > >> > >> Wow! At least get Microsoft Security Essentials. Its free and > >> works pretty > >> well in tests I do at work. > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Tim Lider > >> Sr. Data Recovery Specialist > >> Advanced Data Solutions, LLC > >> http://www.adv-data.com > >> > >> __________________________________________ "Those who desire to give up freedom in order to gain security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one." - Benjamin Franklin
