On 5/15/05, Mark Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >To be clear, so as no-one feels they've been misled in the future, this > is > >not what we'd like in the best of all possible worlds. In that world, > >classpath would be relicensed under the AL, or a compatible licence. > > > >What's listed above is a position we can live with. > > > >Cheers, > > > >Ben. > > Respectfully, perhaps the mistake is not going ahead and developing a > class > library specifically for this project.
The work load involved is too mammoth and we would be in a running race to stay at par...... I realize that is a lot of work, but perhaps it would be better to do that > work than to use code from another project that has different aims and > goals > and an incompatible license. > > _________________________________________________________________ > On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how to > get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement > > -- www.FaeLLe.com <http://www.FaeLLe.com>
