Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:




I spend a good portion of my few spare cycles pondering C# and Mono. I don't have enough of them to have reached any intelligent conclusion, though :)


I am an (mainly Java) application's developer. When I develop one, I want to be able to deploy to Windoze users also. If I can compile my Java app to ANSI CLI "p-code", it's a lot easier to deploy to Windows, since then there is no need for me to deploy ANY other run time, so I just ship my application. So it's a smaller too. (How I get this to work w/ WebStart... I duno YET! I assume Suse will have CLI runtime built in also). This way Harmiony may not need to have a "run-time" for Windowze, if it moves up the food chain and only emits "p-code".

I wrote some GTK# (sharp) apps, and they are fine.


Well, I think that wrt trying to eliminate C++ and C, you've just moved the problem elsewhere - because we'll still need a set of portable intrinsics and bootstrapper, and C++/C are natural candidates.

That said, I would assume that properly architected, you could follow the same pattern and build in the framework we devise a CLI using the same techniques in C# used in Java.

I think that's interesting, and certainly would build a larger community, but my personal interest is a compatible implementation of J2SE.


Yes, must be compatible! (this way if somone OS has Java-compatible JRE on it, I do not have to deploy the JRE. I would only deploy Harmony JRE if they do not have one. X-Box/PlayStation + OpenGL for our 3D needs ;-). If Sun/JRockit /Apple cover it, not a huge need, unless HW manafuctures want a better license )

Yes, I wish to minimize C/C++. Yuck. I used to teach both, those brain cells now invoke gag reflex. The native part is for run time, I have to remind self. I listed people that solve cross platform development(Ex: Geko GTK+, OpenGL(like SWT). The HTTP cross platform C is in wrong direction for us, it does not touch GUI, and bolting it on I predict would be a blind alley).
Include a dll, .so and Cocoa libraries to be called via JNI, like SWT does.

Did I usee enought acryonyms?

Is there any more chances of haveing people that did Eclipse 3.16 on FC4 join Harmony in some way?

.V

Reply via email to