＞1. In order not re-invent the wheel, it would be better to start from
＞ JVM Sun's implementation. The code, if I'm not wrong, is public.
＞ Or, at least, from a solid implementation.
The license is restrictive enough to force FreeBSD users to download
manually and separately Sun's code and the patches....
> 2. An attracting feature would be designing the Harmony JVM to be portable
> across Windows and Linux.
Hum ... I would rather it exists on non linux free unices & some embedded
systems, that really are in need for a /good/ JVM. (win$ can be supported of
course, but I am not sure win$ users are the main target, at the beginning)
RB
-----Original Message-----
From: Enrico Migliore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 5:22 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: some ideas
Hi guys,
here are some ideas:
1. In order not re-invent the wheel, it would be better to start from
JVM Sun's implementation. The code, if I'm not wrong, is public.
Or, at least, from a solid implementation.
2. An attracting feature would be designing the Harmony JVM to be portable
across Windows and Linux.
3. I think that the C language should be used instead of C++.
ciao,
Enrico
