Heh. I agree. I just was too busy in the VM/class library fire-
fight :)
So, given that my foray into architecture discussion was such a
stunning success, would you like to start the discussion of such a
thing might be approached? (Please change the subject, of course...)
geir
On Jun 8, 2005, at 3:01 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
Apparently, only you and I agree. ;-)
Dalibor Topic wrote:
Richard S. Hall wrote:
To me, this is the point. I would like to see all of the
libraries built on to of the JVM to be packaged in a more module-
like fashion, so that their exports and imports are explicit.
There would be many benefits if this were done, rather than
relying on the current approach of assuming that everything is
accessible.
+1
So, from my point of view, it is definitely going in the right
direction to make libraries understand which class loader they
should use to get to their own "module's" classes, as opposed to
just assuming they can get them from any application class loader.
+1 to that, too.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
