Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >> Yeah. Ideally bits and pieces, as they are contributed to Harmony would >> be licensed under the Apache license or even more liberal licenses, > > > Allright. I'll bite. What's more liberal? I consider that the AL is > the most liberal of the commonly found languages as it gives the users > full freedom to do as they choose not only with the licensed software, > but with any derivative works or additional innovation they may combine > with it... >
Sorry for sounding confusing, I meant BSD (without advertising), 'Do What You F*ing Want License', public domain, and similar permissive (and biref) arrangements. The Apache 2.0 License is pretty nice and liberal as software licenses go :) cheers, dalibor topic
