Hi Robert, On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 13:19 +0100, Robert Lougher wrote: > It's odd you never mentioned JamVM's status in the list.
Sorry, certainly not deliberate. I do use jamvm all the time. And I was pretty excited about the progress that Andreas made with jamvm on darwin: http://gnu.wildebeest.org/diary/index.php?p=111 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.devel/6121 Lets see it this way: all the other projects are playing catch up, while jamvm "just works" :) Cheers, Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
