Finally, three serialization tests failed they depend on package name. I'll generate new golden data files for those tests.
Meanwhile I'll try to move drlx and fortress packages from com.openintel to org.apache to see what happens Thanks, Mikhail On 1/18/06, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Seems like I've managed to reproduce the problem: > > I've refactored the code using Eclipse: all that is under > com.openintel.drl.security > I've moved under > org.apache.harmony > > Then I've searched for and found 18 files that still contained > "com.openintel.drl.security" for some reason, and made > search&replace > > After that build failed: > BUILD FAILED > build.xml:393: Test java.security.serialization.CodeSignerTest failed > > Will investigate... > > > BTW, where will we move "com.openintel.drlx" to? > > org.apache.harmony_x ? > org.apache.harmonx ? > org.apache.hx ? > > Thanks, > Mikhail > > > On 1/18/06, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've just updated from SVN, all unit tests from security2 passed > > (including serialization ones). > > Could you please provide more details? > > > > Thanks, > > Mikhail > > > > > > On 1/18/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I am haplessly plodding along. I found one problem (mine) which fixed a > > > test, and now I seem to have a more interesting problem with the > > > serialization tests... > > > > > > Are the serialization tests "golden data" files somehow dependent the > > > com.openintel package structure and would be allergic to a > > > org.apache.harmony package structure? > > > > > > geir > > > > > > > > > Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: > > > > I've been trying to refactor security2 into the org.apache pacakage > > > > space. > > > > > > > > I'm now having test failures. > > > > > > > > Can someone else do a co of security2 and verify? I've backed out the > > > > change so that you need junit and bcprov on your classpath (argh!) and > > > > turned on haltonfailure so that the tests will stop once something goes > > > > wrong. > > > > > > > > I thought I was being careful - while it's clear that I have no idea > > > > what I'm doing, there's clearly something a little more subtle going on > > > > here because I wouldn't think that just moving package names would be a > > > > problem. I assume that there's some provider or other configuration-ish > > > > issue. > > > > > > > > This would be a good learning experience for all of us how this works. I > > > > need to run out for about 20 min... bbiab. > > > > > > > > geir > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
