Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: > I did a hacky integration of security2 to replace security. > > After chatting a bit w/ Tim, I took a very simpleminded approach,
hmm, not sure what to make of that comment ... ;-) > of > just getting the master build. This only works on windows for now. > > 1) the main classlib script builds the java code and produces the > security jar. > > 2) the main native scrip kicks off the full security2 make and copies > the .dll out > > Clearly we have to improve #2, clearly, but once we verify I didn't > screw up too badly, then we can do it stepwise. > > I'd like to propose a change in the build structure to segement by > platform, so that it's very clear the pile that gets built and where, > giving us the freedom to have an appropriate layout for each. > > /trunk/deploy/ > win32/ > include/ > jre/ > linux/ > include/ > jrs/ No point. The build scripts embody which platform they are building for, there is no need to reflect that in the target (even if we _were_ doing x-compiling, which we are not). Regards, Tim -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK.
