[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-92?page=comments#action_12366423 ]
Richard Liang commented on HARMONY-92: -------------------------------------- According to the "package naming convention" (http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/subcomponents/classlibrary/pkgnaming.html), I suggest we rename com.ibm.platform to org.apache.harmony.luni.platform, and com.ibm.platform.struct to org.apache.harmony.luni.platform.struct Any comments? > Suggestion: Move com.ibm.platform from NIO to LUNI > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HARMONY-92 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-92 > Project: Harmony > Type: Improvement > Components: Classlib > Reporter: Richard Liang > > Hello Tim, > As we discussed in JIRA 27 and JIRA 42, I suggest we move the packages > com.ibm.platform and com.ibm.platform.struct from NIO to LUNI component. As > these packages are used by java.net, as well as java.nio.channels. I will > post the proposed fix soon :-) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
