These are very cool -- thanks Stuart.
We need to figure out a way that we can run the japitools on a regular
basis to track progress. It is also a great way to indicate where
people can help round-out a particular package for example.
How should I interpret a line whose percentage figures don't add up to
100% ? For example, looking at:
http://www.kaffe.org/~stuart/japi/htmlout/h-jdk14-harmony
The packages
java.security.interfaces
and java.text
are flagged as less than 100% good, but without any
minor/bad/missing/abs.add sins.
Regards,
Tim
Stuart Ballard wrote:
> Stuart Ballard <stuart.a.ballard <at> gmail.com> writes:
>> If you can give me an url that will always point to the latest jar file(s), I
>> can set up nightly japi results and mail diffs to this list.
>
> Geir gave me a pointer to the latest snapshots, so the japi results are now
> online:
>
> http://www.kaffe.org/~stuart/japi/htmlout/h-jdk10-harmony
> http://www.kaffe.org/~stuart/japi/htmlout/h-jdk11-harmony
> http://www.kaffe.org/~stuart/japi/htmlout/h-jdk12-harmony
> http://www.kaffe.org/~stuart/japi/htmlout/h-jdk13-harmony
> http://www.kaffe.org/~stuart/japi/htmlout/h-jdk14-harmony
> http://www.kaffe.org/~stuart/japi/htmlout/h-jdk15-harmony
> http://www.kaffe.org/~stuart/japi/htmlout/h-harmony-jdk15
>
> The last report triggers a recently-discovered bug in japitools that causes
> some
> StringBuffer methods to be incorrectly reported as "missing in jdk15" (which
> would mean that they are extra methods in harmony). I suggest ignoring the
> last
> report for now, or at least verifying anything it claims against Sun's
> documentation before acting on it.
>
> Other than that the reports should give correct information about Harmony's
> coverage of the API defined in each JDK version.
>
> Whenever these results change for better or worse, (unless I've screwed
> something up), an email will be sent to this list with the differences.
>
> Stuart.
>
>
--
Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IBM Java technology centre, UK.
